Billionaires Dumping Stocks, Economist Knows Why

A handful of billionaires are quietly dumping their American stocks . . . and fast.

Warren Buffett, who has been a cheerleader for U.S. stocks for quite some time, is dumping shares at an alarming rate. He recently complained of “disappointing performance” in dyed-in-the-wool American companies like Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble, and Kraft Foods.

Buffett’s holding company, Berkshire Hathaway, has been drastically reducing his exposure to stocks that depend on consumer purchasing habits. Berkshire sold roughly 19 million shares of Johnson & Johnson, and reduced its overall stake in “consumer product stocks” by 21%. Berkshire Hathaway also sold its entire stake in California-based computer parts supplier Intel.

With 70% of the U.S. economy dependent on consumer spending, Buffett’s apparent lack of faith in these companies’ future prospects is worrisome.

Unfortunately Buffett isn’t alone.

Fellow billionaire John Paulson, who made a fortune betting on the subprime mortgage meltdown, is clearing out of U.S. stocks too. Paulson’s hedge fund, Paulson & Co., dumped 14 million shares of JPMorgan Chase according to a recent filing. The fund also dumped its entire position in discount retailer Family Dollar and consumer-goods maker Sara Lee.

Finally, billionaire George Soros has sold nearly all of his bank stocks, including shares of JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Goldman Sachs. Between the three banks, Soros sold more than a million shares.

So why are these billionaires dumping their shares of U.S. companies?

After all, the stock market is still in the midst of its historic rally. Real estate prices have finally leveled off, and for the first time in years are actually rising in many locations. And the unemployment rate seems to have stabilized.

It’s very likely that these professional investors are aware of specific research that points toward a massive market correction, as much as 90%.

One such person publishing this research is Robert Wiedemer, an esteemed economist and author of the New York Times best-selling book Aftershock.

Before you dismiss the possibility of a 90% drop in the stock market as unrealistic, consider Wiedemer’s credentials.

In 2006, Wiedemer and a team of economists accurately predicted the collapse of the U.S. housing market, equity markets, and consumer spending that almost sank the United States. They published their research in the book America’s Bubble Economy.

The book quickly grabbed headlines for its accuracy in predicting what many thought would never happen, and quickly established Wiedemer as a trusted voice.

A columnist at Dow Jones said the book was “one of those rare finds that not only predicted the subprime credit meltdown well in advance, it offered Main Street investors a winning strategy that helped avoid the forty percent losses that followed . . .”

The chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s said that Wiedemer’s track record “demands our attention.”

And finally, the former CFO of Goldman Sachs said Wiedemer’s “prescience in (his) first book lends credence to the new warnings. This book deserves our attention.”

In the interview for his latest blockbuster Aftershock, Wiedemer says the 90% drop in the stock market is “a worst-case scenario,” and the host quickly challenged this claim.

Wiedemer calmly laid out a clear explanation of why a large drop of some sort is a virtual certainty.

It starts with the reckless strategy of the Federal Reserve to print a massive amount of money out of thin air in an attempt to stimulate the economy.

“These funds haven’t made it into the markets and the economy yet. But it is a mathematical certainty that once the dam breaks, and this money passes through the reserves and hits the markets, inflation will surge,” said Wiedemer.

“Once you hit 10% inflation, 10-year Treasury bonds lose about half their value. And by 20%, any value is all but gone. Interest rates will increase dramatically at this point, and that will cause real estate values to collapse. And the stock market will collapse as a consequence of these other problems.”

And this is where Wiedemer explains why Buffett, Paulson, and Soros could be dumping U.S. stocks:

“Companies will be spending more money on borrowing costs than business expansion costs. That means lower profit margins, lower dividends, and less hiring. Plus, more layoffs.”

No investors, let alone billionaires, will want to own stocks with falling profit margins and shrinking dividends. So if that’s why Buffett, Paulson, and Soros are dumping stocks, they have decided to cash out early and leave Main Street investors holding the bag.

But Main Street investors don’t have to see their investment and retirement accounts decimated for the second time in five years.

Wiedemer’s video interview also contains a comprehensive blueprint for economic survival that’s really commanding global attention.

Now viewed over 40 million times, it was initially screened for a relatively small, private audience. But the overwhelming amount of feedback from viewers who felt the interview should be widely publicized came with consequences, as various online networks repeatedly shut it down and affiliates refused to house the content.

“People were sitting up and taking notice, and they begged us to make the interview public so they could easily share it,” said Newsmax Financial Publisher Aaron DeHoog.

“Our real concern,” DeHoog added, “is the effect even if only half of Wiedemer’s predictions come true.

“That’s a scary thought for sure. But we want the average American to be prepared, and that is why we will continue to push this video to as many outlets as we can. We want the word to spread.”

2,052 Responses to Billionaires Dumping Stocks, Economist Knows Why

  1. Så gøy å få se denne fine kjolen!Man kan se at den er heklet og tilpasset kroppen som skulle bære den, sitter som et skudd! Virkelig flott.Vennlig hilsen Beate

  2. may19 que hijo de puta este zapatero mira que permitir que entren esos rumanos en vez de plantarse con un par de huevos y sacarnos a los españoles de bien de la Unión Europea que seguro que es lo que tenía pensado Rajoy si hubiera ganado

  3. It’s posts like this that make surfing so much pleasure

  4. Calling all cars, calling all cars, we’re ready to make a deal.

  5. I think you’ve just captured the answer perfectly

  6. Looking great in green Vix. Your nail varnish is lovely, looks so much better on tanned hands. (Mine haven't emerged from gloves yet!) Hope you recover from your jetlag soon and have a belting good weekend.

  7. – Yes, The songs are good. They bring in the added flavor for any romantic film. Dil bekhaboo ha hi jaata hai… @KP – Thank you for the kind words. Its worth a watch on DVD. @Bikram – This love story is kinda like the old times. One man one woman theory that died long back, even at the hands of the man who made the movie and the actors who act in it. @A – DVD is a good idea.

  8. Verry yummy, never tried this combination before. Regarding the brown rice, i use the brown basmati rice and once soaked it is not too difficult to cook. I keep it for 4 whistles in the pressure cooker and it will be done.

  9. Yeah, a lot of people apparently like these books (although I can’t seem to find news on when a fourth book is due out from Kramer, and it seems like it should be time). Not the best fit for me, though.

  10. Jetzt wollte ich gerade den Samstag Abend schön ruhig ausklingen lassen, aber jetzt kribbelt es natürlich in den Fingern auch auf WordPress 2.5 upzudaten, da ich auch schon vor ein paar Tagen einen kurzen Blick auf den RC geworfen hatte. Na mal sehen, die Nacht ist ja trotz Zeitverschiebung noch lang

  11. Si Kelevra e la promozione di Netbet, e che la parte della documentazione che non mi piace, 6 pag da fax costano 5euri,questa e la burocrazia Italiana, non ho parole.X quel che riguarda la tua idea certamente parteciperò volentieri.CIAO-BEPPE.

  12. Smack-dab what I was looking for-ty!

  13. Luiz Eduardo disse:Parabéns pelas belas fotos, Chico AM(ike)X…A primeira então ficou Incrível!!!Poxa, só fui na BAC poucas vezes em “portões abertos”, mas nunca assim num dia comum – até pq já me contentava em ver os bicudões zunindo pela minha cabeça nos tempos de Ulbra Mas não sabia que dava pra visitar assim num dia comum… pode ou vc tem “contatos” lá?! hehe…Abraço e mais uma vez parabéns…

  14. Pas mal comme nom de blog Cathy. L’homme avait pensé aussi à “Servir avec des frites” comme titre :)Ne croyez pas qu’on ne mange que ça, c’est le repas du dimanche, là je suis en train de faire un gratin de chou fleur – au gorgonzola il est vrai, on ne se refait pas.

  15. Great hammer of Thor, that is powerfully helpful!

  16. Thanks for writing such an easy-to-understand article on this topic.

  17. Du glemte èn ting: Testene til Hoff & Co er etter deres egne utsagn også gjort på kvinnenes skilandslag, og etter sigende med gode resultater. Medaljehøsten tilsier kanskje ikke det, men jeg fikk en mail fra Jan der han sa så, iallefall..

  18. PRICE, NIMROD?Last year, I hypothesized that elective renters (sponges) would be as happy as clownfish by the Fall, and by Spring, would be considered Turtles…slow to make a decision. It’s here, officially. Here’s what would make me budge. Show me a nice home, that reflects the fact that my husband and I have top credit, have been working for 20+ years earning good pay, and have a big ole Chunky Pam type of downpayment.Do not tell me that to keep my mortgage payment in line with my current rent, I have to buy a double wide ten feet from the PA turnpike in East Jabip, PA.

  19. Thanks for the insight. It brings light into the dark!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *